Talk:Kabul City Center/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Amitchell125 (talk · contribs) 07:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Happy to review the article.

Summary

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Unlink hotel (common word).
 * Ref 5 (Jawad) is not needed in the lead section, as the information it cites is not controversial.
 * Ref 5 (Jawad) is not needed in the lead section, as the information it cites is not controversial.


 * Link Kabul, metal detectors, suicide bomber (Suicide attack).

Features

 * Unlink women (common word).
 * The last paragraph provides too much detail about something that happened in 2010. It needs to be reduced in size.
 * The last paragraph provides too much detail about something that happened in 2010. It needs to be reduced in size.


 * Unlink luxurious, expensive, factories, unemployed (all common words).
 * Consider amending the title, as ‘Reception’ could also mean the entrance to the building. (I would change it to 'Public reception'.)
 * Consider amending the title, as ‘Reception’ could also mean the entrance to the building. (I would change it to 'Public reception'.)


 * I am concerned that there are no references less than seven years old, and some sources are several years older. See https://archive.org/details/express-20110215?q=%22kabul+city+center%22 for a mention in 2011.
 * A template is needed for Ref 3 (Washington Post).
 * A template is needed for Ref 9 (New York Times).
 * Ref 10 (Krishnamurthy) does not appear to verify the text.
 * ✅ I had added quote from the sources into references quote parameter for better verifiability.
 * US $ 5050 per month - Ref 11 (Reuters) gives a rental, but it is 13 years out of date. Is there a more up-to-date number available?
 * I not able to find the latest rental price for the shop in this mall beyond 2008, even no information from unreliable sources are available.
 * US $ 5050 per month - Ref 11 (Reuters) gives a rental, but it is 13 years out of date. Is there a more up-to-date number available?
 * I not able to find the latest rental price for the shop in this mall beyond 2008, even no information from unreliable sources are available.

On hold
Hello, I'm placing this interesting article on hold until 18 September to allow time for the above issues to be addressed. Please ping me if you need to. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 19:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Passing
As both of the remaining points are what I would do myself, and are not particularly needed for GA, i can pass the article. Great work! Amitchell125 (talk) 16:16, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks WPSamson (talk) 06:31, 13 September 2020 (UTC)