Talk:Kacey Wong/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 22:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Will start soon.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 22:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Some comments:
 * Three Dead links.
 * Citations in lead and Infobox are unecessary.
 * Everything in the lead and the Infobox should be mention in the body
 * Seven citations for one point is too many per WP:OVERCITE.
 * More secondary sources, please.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 22:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Please note that I am on a break and editing on a mobile device is wanting. I will do further work on this when I return. Specific responses:
 * I have removed one dead link, which happens to be redundant; the others need replacing rather than removal
 * citations in the lead are not contraindicated, and are often preferred by reviewers for contentious assertions; i cannot do what you request from a mobile device
 * As far as I can tell, the points in the lead are already in the body
 * Excess citations have been culled
 * AFAICT, the vast majority of citations are from secondary sources, and there are only about three from primary sources. Kindly clarify which sources you have an issue with.
 * Passing, well done.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 20:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * --  Ohc  ¡digame! 11:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)