Talk:Kadayıf

Proposed merge of Taş kadayıf into Kadayıf
Just one type of kadayıf, of which there are many; no need for separate articles on individual types. Also, the content in Taş kadayıf is very limited, and sourcing (single source cited) is insufficient to establish notability. Salient content can easily be incorporated into Kadayıf. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:46, 3 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Support, per the above reasoning. signed,Rosguill talk 17:10, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 07:18, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Maghrebi?
On further investigation, the Maghrebi origin claim appears to be WP:SYNTH based on the confusion of Kitāb al-Ṭabikh fī al-Maghrib wa al-Andalus fī ʽAṣr al-Muwaḥḥidīn, li-muʽallif majhūl by an unknown author, Kitab al-Tabikh by Muhammad bin Hasan al-Baghdadi, and Kitab al-Tabikh by Ibn Sayyar al-Warraq. Without a secondary source to identify which Kitab al-Tabikh this recipe actually appeared in, we don't have a way to pinpoint what the actual origin was (and even if the fi al-Maghreb wa al-Andalus source is found to be the correct one, unless it states that this recipe was from the Maghreb, inferring that based on the title would be WP:SYNTH, as it could just as easily be from Andalus). The cited source most closely matches the publication history of the al-Baghdadi kitab al-Tabikh as described on our Wikipedia page for al-Baghdadi, but that page's sources are now inaccessible and I'm a bit concerned about potential citogenesis and/or errors in non-peer-reviewed sources given the clear possibility for confusion. signed,Rosguill talk 20:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC)