Talk:Kaga Rebellion/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 10:09, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

GA criteria
: With a few minor tweaks here and there, the article now fully complies with MOS policies on grammar, as well as general layout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:49, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article uses many reputable publications, and makes frequent citation to them. There are no signs of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article seems to appropriately cover all aspects of its topic for which encyclopedic information was available. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article maintains a neutral tone throughout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:46, 30 May 2016 (UTC) . Since the article's creation last September, it has not been subjected to edit warring or any similarly disruptive behaviour. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:21, 30 May 2016 (UTC) : The article's sole image is licensed in a manner permitted by the Wikimedia Commons, so there is no risk of fair use violation. It serves a relevant conceptual-illustrative purpose for the topic of the article. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:21, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

Although it may have taken me the better part of a month to get around to it, I am confident following my review that this article qualifies as GA. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:50, 30 May 2016 (UTC)