Talk:Kaj Ulrik Linderstrøm-Lang

Style
I have some issues with the writing style in this article. I don't think subjective and personal phrases such as wonderful and cool belong in an encyclopedia article. I rephrased cool, but I haven't removed wonderful, because I didn't have the references used. I suggest that however has the articles, WillowW?, tries to rephrase the most subjective parts... Kjaergaard 06:01, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

You're right, I'm sorry :(  I sometimes get a little carrried away, and Linderstrom-Lang is one of my favorite scientists.  But the memoirs of many of his direct students echo their admiration for his personality as well as his science.  (I'll add a few more references shortly.)  As an aside, I think he's a good role model for PI's ;)

Accuracy
Linderstrom-Lang didn't contribute quaternary structure. That was Bernal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.197.70 (talk) 21:14, 20 March 2012 (UTC)