Talk:Kaleidoscope Entertainment

Untitled
from VfD:

This was tagged for speedy deletion by User:Tregoweth, citing the reason "it is advertising". I'm not sure it needs to be deleted, so I'm listing it here. – Quadell (talk) (help)  14:57, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. Definite advertising, looks like an amateurish homepage for the production company! rturus 15:16, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * weak keep .. Since I am new here I suppose the edited NPOV text is probably acceptable. If I knew how to strike out my earlier delete I would! rturus 22:37, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * I've taken the liberty of doing it for you, and moving your new vote (there's no "fixed procedure", or anything, just do whatever is clear). Look at the source to see how it's done. I'm using the ironic tag. :-) JRM 22:48, 2004 Dec 7 (UTC)
 * Keep. Company seems notable, judging from the list of films. It should be rewritten though, to remove the marketing bumpf. --LeeHunter 16:04, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Definite keep but clean up and tone down the POVvyness. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 17:21, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep Was definitely horrid and amateurish with all the PoV propaganda, which I have removed. They're a notable enough Bollywood (Indian film-making)company. Wyss 19:46, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Advertising. Geogre 19:52, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep the current version. User:Wyss has basically rewritten it, and it's now NPOV.   – Quadell (talk) (help)   21:14, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep it. &mdash;[[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 23:54, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep: DCEdwards1966 00:09, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've seen one of their movies, so they are clearly notable. [[User:GeorgeStepanek|GeorgeStepanek\talk ]] 01:11, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion