Talk:Kallitype

WP:NOT concerns
I'm concerned that the guide-like detail in this article may run afoul of WP:NOT. Some of it may be appropriate with rewording to simply describe the process, but otherwise an external link to a site describing a specific procedure itself would be better. That's about all I have to say. Thanks! &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 15:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * This article was looking more like a stub without any detail on the process itself. I've attempted to add some references and detail back in with regards to the actual process without turning the page back in to a blatant "how to" guide. This article could still use a lot of fleshing out though. It seems a lot of these alt-process articles are skirting WP:NOT territory though (i.e. Van dyke brown) and could use some cleaning to make them read less like instruction booklets. 18pct (talk) 03:20, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Capitalization
I came here hoping to find out whether Kallitype is a proper noun or not, but half the article capitalizes it and half the article does not. Should be at least consistent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.194.65.197 (talk) 20:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)