Talk:Kalol, Gandhinagar

False population figures
People keep adding unsourced population figures to this article, and then changing their own figures

Kalol appeared in to 2001 census here with a population of 100,021 These were:- Males 53,098 Females 46,923 Under 6's 11,912 Males Under 6 - 6,658 females under 6 - 5,254 Literates 74,577 Male literates 42,274 Female literates 32,303

However, Kalol does not seem to appear in the provisional 2011 census here at all - it should be under 24 GUJARAT.

If there are some final, i.e. non provisional, figures, please add these, but you MUST add an official source justify any figures, or they will be deleted. - Arjayay (talk) 18:25, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Please search ' kalol taluka' in google site and edit this article, Jayesh and Kalpesh Thakor (talk) 18:50, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

population of kalol taluka and city
Please make sure that right population of kalol taluka and city. Jayesh and Kalpesh Thakor (talk) 18:46, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

The official figures are at Census of India 2011: GUJURAT District census handbook series 25 Part XIIB p34-35, which can be found here - Arjayay (talk) 07:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I think you have been looking at census 2011.co which is not the official site.

I am live in kalol city, And i saw the public figures are across 2 lakh. Please visit my city and then edit this article in wikipedia. Otherwise you don't any right to changes in this article. Jayesh and Kalpesh Thakor (talk) 17:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The ONLY figures that matter are the ones in the official census - Arjayay (talk) 17:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Okey, You search on google and edit this page properly. Jayesh and Kalpesh Thakor (talk) 18:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Please give me your e-mail address. I send you latest phtos of kalol city. I hope you understand me. Jayesh and Kalpesh Thakor (talk) 19:01, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia is only interested in what has already been published in reliable sources, and those sources must be properly cited so that all the information can be verified by other readers. All information must also be presented in a neutral point of view, which is easier for someone unconnected with the subject, as they do not have a conflict of interest. All the green and blue words in this post connect to Wikipedia policies and guidelines - please read these and hopefully you will understand - Arjayay (talk) 07:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not interested in what you "know", nor what you might claim your photos "prove", nor any original research, or synthesis you carry out.

Okey. I understand that wikipedia is saw unusual information by totally unexpected sourses. This site does not saw right information for readers. They totally waste their times. Jayesh and Kalpesh Thakor (talk) 09:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)