Talk:Kampo

Research into the efficacy of Kampo
This page really needs a section treating effective and disproven kampo treatments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:981:D34D:1:9099:2270:AFCD:E20B (talk) 15:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Ancient japanese ophthalmology
http://books.google.com/books?id=26FsAAAAMAAJ&q=Pusa+man+tang+japanese&dq=Pusa+man+tang+japanese&hl=en&sa=X&ei=eRqnUJ3aHqmL0QHcm4HQCQ&ved=0CEoQ6AEwCQ

Guderyean (talk) 05:14, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

2013 comment
why isn't Kampo classified as pseudoscience?

basically it follows the same concept of TCM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.76.97.109 (talk) 14:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

For the same reason pseudoscience is not used to describe any premodern systems of medicine. Pseudoscience is based on scientific theory that has been disproven or has failed scholarly rigorous modern scientific methods. Dr.khatmando (talk) 10:47, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Kampo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050403000328/http://health.ucsd.edu:80/NTRIALS/031532.htm to http://health.ucsd.edu/ntrials/031532.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 01:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Why 'Kampo' and not Kanpō?
wherever and also in this article, its name seems to be generally acceptrd as Kanpō (exempli gratia here: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2022/12/15/national/science-health/kanpo-covid-study/?utm_source=pianoDNU&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=72&pnespid=quyKmIxH4aDJ7.mipUX3pqlMtQ5Msn1unRE7HFIv6UWVT9P7ODONMtS0rKQt5hR.ND3GkA) GianMarco Tavazzani (talk) 15:36, 15 December 2022 (UTC)