Talk:Kanbay

This article is biased
Not sure why someone thinks it is biased.

It seems pretty factual to me and not biased. The numbers presented can be validated in SEC filings. The history appears accurate and supported by articles and press releases in other.

The tone seems neutral, there aren't a lot of "claims" about performance. There are a couple insinuations ("claims to be CMM Level 5") that might be viewed as insinuating something else. However, I suspect they could produce their CMM Level 5 certifications easily enough.

What's the bias issue? What did I miss?