Talk:Kangaskhan

Untitled
Today an unregistered user has added that there's a 25% chance of capturing a Male Kangaskhan. From what I remember, Kangaskhan is one of those pokémon where all specimens are female (like Jynx and Chansey) but now I'm not so sure. Can anyone confirm either sentence?--Fern 12:17, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Well, according to Google, the only references to a 25% chance of capturing a male Kangaskhan is Wikipedia and a mirror. Everyone else seems to think it's 100% female, and I recall that being it as well. I suspect it was either a subtle vandalism or some confused person.  I changed it back. --Sparky the Seventh Chaos 00:27, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)

Substitute in Pokémon Stadium
While the baby Kangaskhan may not be playable by itself, doesn't the "substitute" model used in the Pokémon Stadium series of games look like a baby Kangaskhan? Also, that model substitutes the glitch Pokémon that are imported into the game, such as Missingno.. Please note this. --Geopgeop 09:39, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Why no baby?
i am wondering why this pokemon has no baby form. It just seems a little creepy for a pokemon to hatch out of its egg and already have an offspring. If it where to have a Babey form it most likely would be blue like the babey in every Kangaskhan's pouch (including a newly hatched one, sorry, can not get over that fact)HHS.student


 * That's just the way the game was made. - Saturn  Yoshi  THE VOICES 15:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Category: Fictional dinosaurs
The category "fictional dinosaurs" was removed before, then re-added a while later. I have removed it again, as per the discussion on the WikiProject Dinosaurs talkpage. Please don't add it again without discussion. -pinkgothic 14:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)