Talk:Kaniadakis statistics

How is this notable?
I am not in the field but it seems like this academic has published a lot of self-referencing articles that are cited by only a few academics a bunch of times. one of the people citing them is the primary editor on all the Kaniadakis pages. None of the journals this guy publishes in are notable (especially for the number of citations the author gets). Seems like there is manipulation and self-citation happening here. This person appears to add a variable to every distribution and throw his name in front of it. Weird Mr election guy (talk) 20:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Merge proposal
I suggest merging all other Kaniadakis pages here. They are variations of the same distribution and not individually notable. The pages include: Hope I did not miss any. A lot of overly technical detail should be removed after the merger. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 21:04, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Kaniadakis distribution
 * Kaniadakis κ-Exponential distribution
 * Kaniadakis κ-Gaussian distribution
 * Kaniadakis κ-Gamma distribution
 * Kaniadakis κ-Weibull distribution
 * Kaniadakis κ-Logistic distribution
 * Kaniadakis κ-Erlang distribution


 * Disagree. From what I can tell, these distributions really are used in a number of different fields. To infer this, I skimmed Kaniadakis Gaussian distribution and at the bottom, I see a bunch of papers from many different authors. This might be some kind of industry churn (see talk page comment up above), but I can't tell by just skimming. ... Anyway, each of the WP articles are quite long, and very dense with formulas. Piling them into one jumbo article that's mega-long seems like a train-wreck to me. The current article lengths are nicely bite-sized. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 03:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)