Talk:Kanji Ishiwara

Project Assessment
The article still seems a bit short overall, but the content seems to cover the subject pretty well and to "not contain major omissions or inaccuracies" as far as I am aware. It could probably still benefit from expansion, as could most articles on WP. But it does appear to fulfill the B-class requirements, so... お疲れ様、ありがとう. LordAmeth 22:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

The Japanese Wiki page is much, much more comprehensive. http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/石原莞爾 If I have time I'm willing to do an import. Getting English language references may be sketchy, but this figure is interesting and historically significant enough to merit the work in the future. Jun Kayama (talk) 09:01, 10 October 2009 (UTC)