Talk:Kanji Tatsumi

Jordan Youngblood Article - Notable enough for inclusion?
This article has a paragraph dedicated to an academic article by Jordan Youngblood. It's jargon-heavy and obtuse. Is this article notable enough for inclusion? As far as I can tell, the author is not a particularly famous academic, and the article hasn't received significant citations outside of a few examples in its field. It seems very unlikely that anyone would encounter the article outside of the academic discipline that spawned it, and the quoted sections of the article don't appear to be particularly enlightening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suitecake (talk • contribs) 03:59, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

What are your thoughts on completely removing the Youngblood article? The article does not seem particularly notable, and its content doesn't appear to be particularly useful in summarizing the broader response to Kanji Tatsumi as a character. Rather, the academic discipline it stems from is pretty cloistered and idiosyncratic. Suitecake (talk) 18:26, 3 September 2019 (UTC)