Talk:Kanthaugen Freestyle Arena/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Grondemar (talk · contribs) 19:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Will post the review shortly. –Grondemar 19:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

This article is very close to meeting the Good Article criteria; I have only a couple of minor concerns:


 * What is Kanthaugen? Is it a village, a mountain, or something else.  It's a little unclear from the text.
 * "At the time of the closing, it was suggested reopened as part of a controversial proposal to build a tobogganing slide from Kanthaugen to Stampesletta." Passive voice: who is suggesting that the ski lift be reopened?


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This review is being placed on hold for a minimum of seven days to allow the above concerns to be addressed.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This review is being placed on hold for a minimum of seven days to allow the above concerns to be addressed.
 * This review is being placed on hold for a minimum of seven days to allow the above concerns to be addressed.

Thanks. –Grondemar 20:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. I've amended the two sentences per your concerns. Arsenikk (talk)  12:54, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks good, thanks for addressing my concerns. I shall now  pass this good article nomination.  Congratulations! –Grondemar 01:06, 23 December 2011 (UTC)