Talk:Karanvir Bohra/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Digvijay411 (talk · contribs) 00:49, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

I do feel it is a good article according to the good article criteria. Digvijay411


 * Involved editors are not to perform GA reviews, especially when you are recently and currently involved in substantial editorial disputes over the content. DMacks (talk) 04:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, the reviewer seems to have constantly edited the article prior to the GA nomination. &mdash;Vensatry (ping) 19:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Not GA at this time
Unfortunately, marking as not GA at this time, due to recent substantial editorial disputes over the content as noted, above. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 08:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)