Talk:Karl Lucas/Archive 1

Further misuse of Wiki Yet again this article has been edited without any citations.The singles section was again reinstated with no reasoning as to why Karl Lucas should be credited for these works. After a fair amount of time since marking unverified claims to be cited, they have been removed.

There is a note in the history mentioning a person. My guess it that Karl Lucas is editing this himself, treating it like a CV. Whoever this author is, they clearly do not understand that Wikipedia is based on factual information and I strongly reccommed they read Wiki's documents before editing this page again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.127.136 (talk) 19:28, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Singles (music) section again and other claims Since there are many claims being made the the user 91.108.60.201 without any forms of reference, to keep this page accurate and truthful those that have no reference to back them up have been marked.

The singles specifically appear to be contentious. The person adding them has added them again without providing a good reason as to why they should appear. There is no reference to Karl Lucas on any of those singles' indiviual Wikipedia pages, nor is Karl Lucas credited for them.

I suspect this is in some way or another malicious activity.

Would the person adding these please read Wikipedia's documents on citing articles and respond with reasonable explanation as to why they Karl Lucas should be credited.

Singles (music) section Could the author who is insterting the singles section please provide credence as to why Karl Lucas should be credited for these works. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.9.127 (talk) 14:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

What the hell has happened to this article!

It's clear that Karl Lucas is posting these things as he's admitted it's him in the history and at the same time made a libellous comment.

I am the original creator of this article and can confirm that Karl Lucas has had nothing to do with the singles that have been posted on this page.

In one single he appeared for a matter of 2 seconds, in another he can be seen in one shot at the back and in the third only half of his face can be seen at the back of shot if you pause. He has had no part in the production or creation of them and to credit himself for them is enormously misleading.

It is wholly unreasonable for the singles to appear on this page.

In all three music videos, Lucas is uncredited and unpaid. He's only in them because he was there in other capacities.

This article is a stub, Wiki is being misused by this indivual to an extent that is frankly embarassing and I would have no objection to it being deleted. Noodnood (talk) 18:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Please feel free to delete this page.Quite frankly I'd be relieved.

User 'NoodNood' created this page about me for some reason and it was very flattering at first. I am a little startled that 'noodnood' has watched all three pop videos of me and timed each shot. Why create a page about someone and then dispute it? Seems suspiciously dubious...moving on to the other user who is really obssessed by me....

...Now the page has been turned into a dispute by someone who used to be a friend and has got (allegedly) 'mental health issues'.

It really doesnt matter what happens with this page,its just a shame that wikipedia is being used as a battleground for someones petty childishness.

Wikipedia is a fantastic site that should not be abused or used for childish squabbles.

People should grow up and move on!

The end! (91.108.7.191 (talk) 16:21, 15 March 2010 (UTC))

PLEASE CAN WIKIPEDIA STOP THIS CHILDISH VENDETTA BY A 'USER'

 * Dispute resolution.  fetch  comms  ☛ 18:07, 16 March 2010 (UTC)