Talk:Karlughs

Unreliable
This very long article is totally unreferenced, without proper citations and much information in it, if not an outright hoax and lie, is certainly misstatement and misrepresentation. I hope that some neutral and experienced senior editors will take a look at this and drastically prune it, thanks 39.54.229.95 (talk) 10:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Abdullah Shah


 * I have stubbed it. No idea if it is a hoax. - Sitush (talk) 09:30, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I have re-stubbed the article after an unregistered editor challenged the re-inserted content. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:08, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Karlugh Turks


A tag has been placed on Karlugh Turks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Poorly written, unsourced, also Karluks already exist."

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Beshogur (talk) 16:59, 25 April 2020 (UTC)