Talk:Kata'ib Hezbollah

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Kata'ib Hezbollah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121003135853/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iXFldvDeEgr9cymXdQWf-QId7BqA to http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iXFldvDeEgr9cymXdQWf-QId7BqA

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 16:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Conversation with Jayaguru-Shishya

 * "Indeed, I was wondering the same with you. The paragraph you introduced: [...] That doesn't sound too fluent English to me."

I don't know if you're lying or misremembering, but I did not introduce that paragraph. It was already on the page when I started editing. I improved its grammar, because it was in broken English when I arrived. Anyways, you have no room to criticize my grammar when your contribution to the article was "It has been active in the Syrian Civil War, as well as it has participated some battles against the Islamic State in Iraq.", which is horribly grammatically incorrect.
 * "As quoted above, you carried out three edits after I had placed the  tag."

Like I said previously, I started them before I saw the tag and stopped editing after I saw it.
 * "So do you have sources stating that they are fighting in a large-scale in Iraq? There might be plenty of reasons if they aren't doing so. So far, the sources have pointed out some specific battles only."

They have fought in multiple battles in the war since the beginning and show no sign of stopping, therefore they're part of the war. Why are you disputing this? Do you believe that, because they haven't fought ISIS within the last few months, they're not part of the war anymore? If that's your logic, then none of the other Popular Mobilization Forces are part of the war against ISIS either, since they've been mostly inactive for a few months. Like most of your other objections, this is petty, semantic, nonsense.

war crimes
1.since other editors coudln't be bothered to come to the talk page (despite their obnoxious insistence that tohers do so) 2.im not going to bother reverting the war crimes bit anyone to save an edit war 3.but if the other editors had bothered reading the reuters article instead of edit warring, they would see that the text on the page is all exactly the same as on the reuters article, and it essentially consists of a quote from the UN commissioner on human rights I did not add anything extra. So shut up and stop lying about NPOV 4.the real, very strange NPOV issue is why some editors would want to go out of their way to whitewash the wikipedia page of a terrorist group? 5.Jayaguru-Shishya, what is your agenda in supporting terrorism on wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.112.148.181 (talk) 14:47, 7 July 2016


 * 82.112.148.181, that's not a direct quote from Zeid; that's a direct WP:COPYVIO of the Reuters article. Moreover, I'd recommend not to make WP:PERSONAL attacks on other users. Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 18:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:39, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Nujabaimage.jpg

Brigade
According to my dictionary كتائب means battalion not brigade, as mentioned in the article. I am not an expert, but it could be significant. PlasmaZebulon (talk) 16:59, 28 June 2020 (UTC)