Talk:KateModern

Untitled
This page was already in the correct location. The page displayed as kateModern instead of KateModern because the template was at the top of the page. I've removed the template and no move is necessary.--JayHenry 01:27, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

WP:NOTLINK
WP:NOTLINK states "There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to an article" The links in question are useful and content relevant since they provide additional information about the characters without overwhelming the page. Therefore, I believe they should stay on the page as is. --Zoeydahling (talk) 23:31, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * See WP:NOTLINK, a table of consisting of external links obviously violates it.--Otterathome (talk) 21:01, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Seeing as how I cited the relevant part of WP:NOTLINK that backs up what I am saying, it would probably be helpful if you would do the same because no one is a mind reader, and I do not know just by receiving a link to a page what exactly on that page you are attempting to highlight. --Zoeydahling (talk) 21:23, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * User:Whpq appears to have removed them. The table has/had columns existing purely of external links on specific details of the article which violates #1 of WP:NOTLINK. Also violates WP:EL, Bebo definately doesn't comply with it. It would be like linking to every character bio on thesimpsons.com in the List of characters in The Simpsons article.--Otterathome (talk) 19:23, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I had not seen this discussion when I made my changes to the page. I removed the external links for several reasons.  Firstly, Wikipedia is not a directory service.  The table provided essentially a link farm which is not acceptable.  Secndly, the links all were to content that can be found by going to the official site listed in the external links section.  We don't generally put multiple links to multiple pages from the same site.  Thirdly, the links were to Bebo (social networking) and LGPedia (openwiki) which tend to be frowned upon. -- Whpq (talk) 19:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Zoey, you can file an WP:RFC if you'd like further outside input.--Otterathome (talk) 19:41, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

--- The season 2 summary spoils the end of season 1 really badly. Could this be revised? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.94.94.20 (talk) 02:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)