Talk:Kate Bingham

Criticism
There is currently nothing about problems about any potential conflict of interest (I wrote something else before, but just edited this, as I think a 'potential conflict of interest ' is a more fair description than the prior one I used). I do not want to contribute to rumour mongering either, so I will not be much more specific, but there have been reports "in the www" recently pertaining to payment and expenditures in this regard, respectively from 2020 (PR consultants and the vaccination issue for example). However had, wikipedia right now has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about this at all, not even any mention at all whatsoever. I understand that wikipedia has to be objective, but it really should at the least mention this somewhere in the main article. 2A02:8388:1602:6D80:FA9F:8D5F:B40F:A65A (talk) 16:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

If you find a credible source reporting the possible conflict of interest, then we can include it. We can't inlcude your opinion. Dan88888 (talk) 09:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Poorly sourced critisism
There are two critisisms of her in the article that point to articles in The Times or Sunday Times. She denies the truth of these. They were possibly just leaks from Dominic Cummings with no shred of truth intended to dicredit her. The fact that a newspaper reported the "Government source" is not the same thing as evidence something is true. I suggest we remove these allegations unless and until a more credible source is found, as is appropriate under BLP guidelines. Any objections? Dan88888 (talk) 09:14, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok, then consensus is to remove this. Dan88888 (talk) 19:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)