Talk:Kate Gordon (psychologist)

Good work!
This looks well organized and very professional. I really like the organization of the article so far and look forward to seeing your progress! Harg6896 (talk) 03:38, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! Good luck on your article. I'll try to get the chance to check yours out if I can and provide some possible suggestions that would hopefully help you out. TreyDumler (talk) 16:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Feedback (again)
Hey Trey! It looks like the article talk page to which I posted my peer review was deleted, so I figured that I would post again here to make sure that I get credit. I am glad that you took my advice in combining the career/work sections and adding a section for publications. I also think that there is a lot less repetition between your lead and career sections. I hope that I have helped you improve your article! I do have one final suggestion: perhaps you could add links to some of her publications (if links are available), in case a reader wants to learn more about a particular subject. I think the article looks really solid now, keep up the good work! David Potts (talk) 20:37, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Thank you! I was trying to look for your feedback the other day and couldn't find it. Your suggestions were very helpful and I completely agree that what you had said made the article solid. I do intend to add links to her publications as this would help the audience find additional resources easier. Thanks again! TreyDumler (talk) 16:03, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Feedback on Kate Gordon
Jasonmonroe417 (talk) 21:48, 23 November 2016 (UTC) --Intro, 3rd sentence, should either read "Specifically, she published A work" or "published works" --Intro, second paragraph "...Feb 18, 1878" (comma after day not month) --Next sentence "...with both her father and brother being" would read better, I think. --"...from 1904 until 1948 when she was made a professor..." would read better than two sentences --Career section "The Psychology of Meaning" should be italicized or quotation marks I think.

Great job and you have made a very nice contribution here with lots of material.Jasonmonroe417 (talk) 21:48, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestions and I corrected everything. TreyDumler (talk) 16:04, 29 November 2016 (UTC)