Talk:Katharine Blunt

peer review
Anna: Overall good job. I would re-read through the whole article as you switch between calling her "Katharine" and "Blunt". Since it's an academic source, she should be referred to by the last name. I would also reread through her career section, as I felt like there was some bias in saying that home economics was an easier field for women. Overall, though, good job, but just read everything over and see if there are certain areas where you could make things less wordy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annasamuels (talk • contribs) 16:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Ashley: The scholarship and leadership section have content that overlap. For example, "During this time, she also served as an editor of the University of Chicago's Home Economics Series", can be added to the leadership section as well. Consider moving some sentences around. Overall, very cohesive organization, especially the subtitles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acamacho20 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Giselle: I appreciate the use of language and clear structure of your article. i would suggest as it comes to conext to perhaps incorporate some of the agreements between Conn and New London in the creation of the college to not only accredit the community but to also point to some of her leadership skills in gaining this project off the ground :). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giselle.olaguez (talk • contribs) 20:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)