Talk:Katharine Way/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: LT910001 (talk · contribs) 11:09, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for waiting. In conducting this review, I will:
 * Provide an assessment using WP:GARC
 * If this article does not meet the criteria, explain what areas need improvement.
 * Provide possible solutions that may (or may not) be used to fix these.

Commentary
Another well-written article. Unfortunately I don't have access to the books, but everything in the websites (except for the birth dates) match. Am consistently impressed with the high-quality of original writing and synthesis within your writing, Hawkeye. Am promoting and have made the relevant changes. --LT910001 (talk) 10:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Minor question, did you use the death index (http://www.mocavo.com/Social-Security-Death-Index/246389) to find the correct date of birth? I have been a little surprised when reviewing your articles how inaccurately a person's major life dates have been reported. --LT910001 (talk) 10:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * This one was a particularly difficult one because one major source was inaccurate enough to require a footnote. I don't recall using the SSN index on this article, although it was used on some others. It's often disappointing. Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:36, 15 April 2014 (UTC)