Talk:Kathiawari horse/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk) 01:12, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Criteria:

 :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . As a matter of fact, it's rarely been edited at all, over the past couple of months! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 01:17, 25 March 2011 (UTC) : No problem's here. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 01:15, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Comments

 * "At some points in the breed's history, breeders focused on the preservation of these curving ears, to the detriment of some other, more important, physical characteristics." I just feel this sentence should be cited. I have no doubt it is true, but this seems the sort of information which could be pinned as original research if not directly followed by a source. Other than that, the article looks fine to me. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 01:36, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The ref for this sentence was placed a couple of sentences later. However, I agree that this is something that would be ripe for a fact tag, so I have duplicated the reference at the end of this particular sentence. Please let me know if there are any other issues that you see, and thank you very much for undertaking this review! Dana boomer (talk) 02:25, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, I think this article checks clear against everything! We've another GA in our midst! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 03:12, 30 March 2011 (UTC)