Talk:Kathleen Barr

Date of Birth Change
Does anyone have any confirmation she was born in 1973? It's 1967 according to most sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WestBounce (talk • contribs) 22:40, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Source on name?
My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic - (The Great and Powerful) Trixie, Hoops

I'm not disputing whether or not she did it, but where does the name of the second character come from?JIMfoamy1 (talk) 05:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Not sure, but she also does Queen Chrysalis in the same series. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.248.252.153 (talk) 02:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Dates Active
This article claims that Kathleen Barr has been active since 1979, but I don't think that's accurate. You see, many anime series, especially back in those days, spent years if not decades undiscovered by English-speaking audiences before dubbing companies like The Ocean Group finally produced versions they could understand. So while the Galaxy Express 999 movie originally came out in 1979, the Canadian English dub wasn't produced/released until 1996. However, many of those original Japanese release years are still on her page's credits list instead of the dub years. Shouldn't we change that? --Bybbyy (talk) 11:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Infobox pointless?
I know this is kind of a dumb question to ask, but why is an infobox pointless for the article now. Because it doesn’t make any sense to not include one, because every other actor/actress articles have infobox in their articles, why can’t we not include it for Kathleen Barr anymore? I hope someone can answer this question for me because Geraldo Perez keeps claiming that it’s pointless to include in here in the article. No matter how many times I add it back in, it gets removed again. But like I said, I’m not trying to start an edit war on it, I just wanted to understand why we can’t include it anymore. If someone can answer this for me, that would be better for me to understand and I will respect it. Again, I apologize for restoring it back over and over again. 50.79.191.241 (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Disinfoboxes goes over some of the reasons, it is an essay - some editor's opinion, and I don't agree with all of it. Not every actor has one either, just when it has enough information to be useful as a summary and editors think it adds value to the reader to have one. It is an editorial choice to have one or not. In this case the article is short and the infobox just repeats what is in the opening phrase of the article (name and occupation) and first entry of filmography (first notable activity year). It adds no value to the reader and just takes up page space. If it had at least sourced birth info, I personally would consider it useful at that point as age would also show up, but other editors would like to see more than even that to support one. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:48, 14 May 2023 (UTC)