Talk:Kathleen Stock

subsequent career
didn’t she join the staff at an extremely controversial university after leaving Sussex? This is crucial information. 2A01:CB05:54:C200:6944:BD1:F947:D65D (talk) 06:47, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I think it’s probably the University of Austin which you’re thinking of. This is mentioned at the end of the Academic career section. Sweet6970 (talk) 11:40, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 'extremely controversial' - and hysterical UK 'academics' launching a witch hunt against her is, of course, not controversial at all ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.154.17 (talk) 09:07, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Crucial information to whom? Are you convincing a jury against Kathleen stock? This is outrageous reading Wikipedia is part of the promotion of anti-female rhetoric. Anyone not making way is hateful. I wonder what the AGP wiki states, most likely “debunked theory”. 2600:1006:B185:6EF9:2025:7F9C:79D6:E408 (talk) 02:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 September 2023
Edit should be re-applied: 04:44, 10 June 2023‎ Snokalok talk contribs‎ 58,022 bytes −7‎  →‎Views on gender self-identification: Removed word “theory”, seemed pov

Undo was insufficient: "The expression ‘gender identity theory’ is used 4 times in the text of the ES source, as well as in the headline." It does not matter what the link states as it doesn't address the reason for the change, further the link is a book BY Stock, to say it's biased on the topic is an understatement. 24.206.115.25 (talk) 09:52, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting wait.svg Already done Lightoil (talk) 02:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC)