Talk:Kati Whitaker

Copyvio allegation
The detected so called copy vios are all titles of awards. These are the names of the awards, they are factual statements and not copyrightable. Lumos3 (talk) 09:17, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't think so. Here's a comparison of one passage:


 * There's also, I'm afraid, clear typographic evidence of direct copy-pasting from that source. The article needs to be rewritten in original language: the meaning of the sources can freely be taken and used, but the form of expression, the words and structure of the text, must be entirely your own; of course, proper names such as "Educational Journalist of the Year" need not, and usually cannot, be phrased in any other way. If you'd like to start on a rewrite, please follow this link to the right place to do that. Please make quite sure that no "tainted" text gets copied from the old version to the new (because that would render it useless). Please ask if you need help or advice. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:29, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/crossing_continents/6270834.stm, http://www.whistledown.net/talent/kati-whitaker/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed for deletion
I have proposed this page for deletion, as, with all due respect to the subject, I do not think she meets the Wikipedia notability criteria. It looks quite messy and is in need of tidying up, but I don't think it's worth my time doing that for an article without much relevance. Its had less than 300 views in the last year. --TrottieTrue (talk) 17:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)