Talk:Katie and Emily/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewing right now... // Gbern3 (talk) 18:36, 17 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Promoting: Meets all GA criteria as listed here.


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose and grammar): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass

Congratulations. I was going to place this article on hold for GA promotion b/c I wasn't sure if the plot section needed references/citations. After checking four other GA-rated TV episode articles (none of which had refs in the plot section), I decided this promotion was justly deserved. I saw this article has been listed since July. You've been very patient. // Gbern3 (talk) 19:01, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. — 97198 (talk) 06:29, 18 September 2009 (UTC)