Talk:Katja Glieson

Protection request
Due to continued vandalism by anonymous user, just as before, when the page was semi-protected before

Not done: requests for increases to the page protection level should be made at Requests for page protection. - Arjayay (talk) 08:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

WP:COI
User:Benjackson77 User talk:Benjackson77 Special:Contributions/Benjackson77, an extensive contributor to this article, apparently as a very close professional relationship to the subject. Given that, I have tagged the article for WP:COI and have stated the relationship here. Safiel (talk) 03:17, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Safie True, I manage her. What do you want to do about it? There have been no other contributions to the page by anyone else. Happy to take suggestions. I have no dispute if admins take issue with the page I created and want to abide by any wikipedia standards and criteria for inclusion. Benjackson77 (talk) 04:52, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * There just needs to be an awareness that you have a conflict of interest. While you may edit within the guidelines of WP:COI, other editors who review this article will know to check for anything that may not be of a neutral tone. I am just trying to create an awareness, nothing more. Safiel (talk) 05:37, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, since you are close to her, it is possible that you might, without intending to, fail to be totally neutral when adding or revising something. Other editors will be more aware to check and correct any bias that might creep in. No reflection on you personally at all, but it is hard for any person to dispassionately write about something they are close to, which is why WP:COI exists in the first place. I have no issue with you editing this article, as long as you bear WP:COI in mind while doing so. Thanks. Safiel (talk) 05:42, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ":User:Safie Oh yes that's great and I completely understand and think that is very wise, and I've previously had conversations with User:Davey2010 about that and kept the article down to a minimum to avoid anything non-neutral. However, the page does seem to have turned into nothing more than something I wrote and wrote alone (which is not what I desired when I originally created it and occasionally tried to add neutral content to it), periodically edited only by saboteurs with something against Katja. I have no interest in maintaining the page or updating it with new information. There also seems to be an ongoing discussion about deleting the page. Whilst this is obviously confronting when you're the author of the page, I have no logical objections to that from a neutral standpoint. Benjackson77 (talk) 05:49, 21 May 2015 (UTC)