Talk:Katori-class battleship/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 02:04, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * "As Japan lacked the industrial capacity to build such warships herself," -- I don't know if there's a policy allowing for countries to be referred to with a female pronoun.
 * "The ships carried a maximum of 2,150 tonnes (2,120 long tons) of coal and 377–750 long tons (383–760 t) which allowed them..." -- Is there something missing here?
 * "making a total of twelve guns, compared to the King Edward VIIs." -- I think you might have meant to add the total number of guns the King Edward VII class had here.
 * Crew complement isn't mentioned in the body, only in the infobox, and needs a ref.
 * "Whilst conducting gunnery training on 16 September 1907..." -- Where did this accident occur?
 * "landing of Japanese troops in Siberia in August of that year as decided to intervene in the Russian Civil War." -- did you mean "as Japan decided to intervene..."?
 * In refs section but not used: Andidora 2000, Brown 1999, Gardiner and Gray 1984
 * Ref 15 is inconsistent with other refs (Silverstone 1984, for example, also only has one footnote but is still listed in the references section) I think the book just needs to be added.
 * Found one duplicate link, which I fixed. There are no disambiguation links, and the external link appears to be working.
 * Images appear to be properly licensed and I see no problems with article stability or neutrality.


 * Placing the article on hold pending a few small fixes. — Ed! (talk) 13:29, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * All done; thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 07:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Great work! Passing the GA now. — Ed! (talk) 11:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)