Talk:Kawasaki, Kanagawa

Article importance
Kawasaki a top importance article? Aren't we being ridiculous? Shouldn't such an extraordinary claim be justified? urashimataro (talk) 00:23, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * As a major city with the 9th largest population in Japan, I personally don't see anything ridiculous or extraordinary about rating this article as "Top importance" within the WikiProject Japan. It seems to fit the criteria set out in the project's importance scale, and all the articles for other major Japanese cities appear to be similarly treated. --DAJF (talk) 01:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

''High probability that non-Japanophiles would look this up. Must have had a large impact outside of Japan and be known in the majority of the world.'' I remain unconvinced. urashimataro (talk) 04:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Kawasaki, Kanagawa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080807173931/http://www.baltimorecity.gov/government/intl/sistercities.php to http://www.baltimorecity.gov/government/intl/sistercities.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 10:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)