Talk:Kazuhide Uekusa

Some questions to all the people who watched this article
202.235.132.50 06:58, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
 * No. 1: What do you think about Kazuhide Uekusa's crime?
 * No. 2: Are you able to forgive a crime that he committed? (Please tell me the reason if you can forgive or not him)
 * No. 3: What will you do if you are a victim of his crime?


 * No. 1 answer: I thought what a foolish thing he did!! He is really foolish. I can't still understand why he who is an elite did such a nonsense thing and must be arrested.
 * NO. 2 answer: Of course, I can't forgive him. Needless to say, voyeurism is immoral action.
 * NO. 3 answer: If I'm a victim, I will escape from there or hit him.

(Sorry, I can't speak English well) 61.26.82.3 14:45, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

Uhm... I'm not sure if wikipedia is supposed to be used for this. 80.56.102.83 00:22, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

VfD
On April 20, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep (no consensus). See Votes for deletion/Kazuhide Uekusa for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 21:02, 5 May 2005 (UTC)


 * I'm not going to comment on the deletion vote, since it's long over. But I was surprised to see so many deletion votes and to read even the arguments for keeping.  We should absolutely not be motivated by concerns about 'offending honour' or any such thing, and the apparent level of news coverage on this individual is, in itself, sufficient justification for the article's existence. --Saforrest 03:37, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Request from article
Request, please insert this image in his article

Laws broken?
Can someone clarify what law(s) has this man broken? e.g. are there laws in Japan such as 'thou shall not peek under girls' skirts?', did he violate someone's right to privacy? or was it sexual harrassment, etc --68.61.28.45 01:48, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

He violated nuisance laws. "第五条　何人も、人に対し、公共の場所又は公共の乗物において、人を著しくしゆう恥させ、又は人に不安を覚えさせるような卑わいな言動をしてはならない. " (Article V Obscene languages and behaviors, which make people shame or embarrassed, in public places or public vehicles are forbidden) - Tokyo ordinance against disturbing the peace.--1523 00:33, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Invisible Government Power behind the arrest
Well informed Japanese academics believe that the arrest was instructed by Government in an attempt to destroy Uekusa's credibility, because he was a sharp critic of Government fiscal and monetary policies. He was arrested by supposedly Kanagawa Prefecture Police in Tokyo, which is outside of Kanagawa Prefecture Police's boundary. This could happen only when and if special police (Koh-an) was involved.

Infobox biography
What, exactly, is the reason for including the line 'Spouse: woman who is 7 years old younger' in the biography infobox? Apart from its ungrammaticality, it seems spiteful and doesn't convey any useful information about the man. -Shai-kun 22:07, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Invisible Hand Mirror of God
Is there a source to the statement that his handmirror is named that? Does he call it that, or is it a nickname the Japanese media has given it? As the article reads, it doesn't make much sense... 68.149.233.141 06:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Uekusa.jpg
Image:Uekusa.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Uekusa.jpg
Image:Uekusa.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

British pounds
I'm wondering why the amount of Yen in also converted into british pounds, generally it uses American dollar,s and if it's because the main currecies for English wikipedia are US and pounds why isn't Canadian included? Should this be removed?

Momentary Policy Institute?
Shouldn't that be "Monetary" in the Career section? I'm not sure if it's simply a typo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davor.danach (talk • contribs) 03:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Writing Mirrar Man violates the Wiki rule. WP:LIBEL
Writing Mirrar Man violates the Wiki rule. WP:LIBEL WP:YESPOV   Ejoe2 (talk) 04:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello, Ejoe2 aka Sanyet aka Loperw aka Blocked Watson System=scumbag. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections.
 * I'm sorry, but writing "Mirror Man" does not violate WP:LIBEL nor WP:YESPOV. It's referenced through the citation of reliable published sources. 122.16.131.206 (talk) 15:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

It is Wikipedia policy to delete libelous material when it has been identified. It doesn't matter if there is a citation or not for the libel You should respect the Wiki rule. You yourself already violated so many times while you blaming other users. WP:LIBEL Ejoe2 (talk) 09:24, 23 June 2014 (UTC)


 * First of all, please stop using multiple accounts, Ejoe2. You should respect the WP:SOCK policy. I have opened the sockpuppet investigation at Sockpuppet investigations/Sanyet.
 * Writing Uekusa's being nicknamed Mirror Man is not libelous at all. WP:LIBEL states that “the goal of Wikipedia is to create an encyclopedic information source adhering to a neutral point of view, with all information being referenced through the citation of reliable published sources, so as to maintain a standard of verifiability.” The information you repeatedly removed is already supported with reliable sources such as Anil Aggrawal's Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices and Mark D. West's Secrets, Sex, and Spectacle: The Rules of Scandal in Japan and the United States. Please explain the reason why you think it is libelous. 123.225.45.201 (talk) 20:24, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

It is Wikipedia policy to delete libelous material when it has been identified. It doesn't matter if there is a citation or not for the libel. WP:LIBELEjoe2 (talk) 05:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)


 * My understanding is also that such statements are not libelous, but rather than edit-warring, which could get you blocked very quickly, I recommend ask for further opinions at Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. --DAJF (talk) 05:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

It is Wikipedia policy to delete libelous material when it has been identified. It doesn't matter if there is a citation or not for the libel. WP:LIBELEjoe2 (talk) 08:17, 26 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Ejoe2, you are currently engaged in an edit war. Please explain the reason why you think writing Mirror Man is libelous. Also, as DAJF said above, I recommend ask for further opinions at Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. 123.224.156.245 (talk) 21:00, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

It is Wikipedia policy to delete libelous material when it has been identified. It doesn't matter if there is a citation or not for the libel. WP:LIBEL PLEASE RESPECT THE INDIVIDUAL AND WIKIPEDIA RULE. YOU ALREADY VIOLATED THE RULE TOO MANY TIMES HERE. Ejoe2 (talk) 01:15, 27 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Ejoe2, you reverted my edits again without explaining the reason why you think it is lbelous. Additionally, you are the only one who thinks it is libelous. Please do not ignore WP:CONSENSUS and WP:BRD. 122.26.193.33 (talk) 01:28, 27 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Please provide sources stating the material you're removing is false. Just shouting "it's libel" when trying to remove reliably sourced statements is fruitless. --Neil N  talk to me 01:55, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Oh, that's too clear for us if you read his own article in which the person Uekusa stated that Wikipedia contains various false contents(URL: http://uekusak.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2010/11/post-5ec3.html). And I edited its page and will reedit it until there is no more libels against the person from Wikipedia. You have to notice that who continues the war is not me but the multiple account user. I have to protect Uekusa from any violation of human rights. URL: http://uekusak.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2010/11/post-5ec3.html   Ejoe2 (talk) 16:11, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I cannot read Japanese but that's a self-published source. The subject does not get to decide what is actually false. You removed, "His trial opened at the Tokyo District Court on March 23, 2005, and the Chief Justice fined him 500,000 yen and confiscated his hand mirror." Why is this false? --Neil N  talk to me 16:32, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, I can read Japanese, and that blog post is talking about the Japanese Wikipedia article, not this one. And the post is three and a half years old. If the subject has written anything about the English Wikipedia article, though, I would be interested to see it. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 00:43, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Kazuhide Uekusa. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://mdn.mainichi.jp/culture/waiwai/archive/news/2006/09/20060922p2g00m0dm024000c.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 13:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kazuhide Uekusa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://japundit.com/archives/2006/01/27/1921/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140820022608/http://www.asiax.biz/column/musashino/001.php to http://www.asiax.biz/column/musashino/001.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:46, 3 May 2017 (UTC)