Talk:Kedarnath Temple

Move?

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Kedarnath Temple → —
 * WP:VERB - WP:AT Thaejas (talk) 03:42, 25 April 2010 (UTC).
 * This article is about one temple at one place; "Kedarnath Temple" could be treated as a proper name?. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:34, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose Proper name, and so should be capitalised.  Skinsmoke (talk) 13:10, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * For consensus against this move, see Wikipedia_talk:Hinduism-related_topics_notice_board-- Redtigerxyz Talk 16:03, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kedarnath Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029193204/http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=2 to http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=2
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029184513/http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=3 to http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=3
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029192556/http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=4 to http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=4
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029184226/http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=6 to http://www.badarikedar.org/content-badari.aspx?id=6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:34, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kedarnath Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090604130933/http://rudraprayag.nic.in/Guptkashi.htm to http://rudraprayag.nic.in/Guptkashi.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090520171450/http://www.badrikedar.com/temple/GuptkashiVishwanath.html to http://www.badrikedar.com/temple/GuptkashiVishwanath.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071124004721/http://www.badarikedar.org/content-kedar.aspx?id=55 to http://www.badarikedar.org/content-kedar.aspx?id=55

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Kedarnath Temple
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Kedarnath Temple's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "bisht": From Panch Kedar:  From Rudranath:  From Madhyamaheshwar:  From Tourism in Uttarakhand:  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:27, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Badrinath Temple Winter.jpg
 * Kedarnath empty.jpg

Buried in a glacier for 400 years?
I'm finding a few sources that claim that this temple was buried in a glacier for about 400 years, and apparently the claim was made in a report by the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology. However, I can't find any credible evidence to corroborate this claim. Is anyone familiar with this story? Littlejohn657 (talk) 00:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)