Talk:Kegel Male Exercise Trainer

NPOV
Can you tell me precisely what to do to meet the NPOV guidelines? Petrosianii (talk) 22:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I have checked the history of the article, this tag was added by User:Backslash Forwardslash so I would ask him as to what he was specifying. You can read the guidelines and ask him which he does not think you meet. If he doesn't respond to you in a reasonable amount of time, then just remove the tag. It's his responsibility for adding the tag to bring up his objections and suggestions on the talk page, which he has not done yet. Tyciol (talk) 23:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Criticism objectivity
More has been added to the "Criticism" section to make the article more objective. Petrosianii (talk) 21:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * That's good, I am going to clean up this and the other sections a little bit. Tyciol (talk) 23:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

References need work
The layout on the references needs to be corrected, into the form [URl_here Text here] which would clean up the reference list. I fixed the first so the original author has a pattern to follow if interested. About half or more of the references are not reliable sources. User:Alice.haugen 20:16, 11 April 2009
 * That's an okay suggestion, although please specify which resources you do not think are reliable and why to help Petro work with this. I also noticed Alice that you added a bunch of other tags (using 'Friendly'?) such as advert, pov, weasel. I understand the category/wikify, those are easily resolved, but for the former three, could you explain these objections to Petro? He has made a subject for the neutrality issue (which is actually brought up twice, I'll organize this better on the tag headings) so we can work through this and see if it has individual merit or if it can be merged into kegal exercises without sacrificing content. I do think that it probably does need its own article, even if it were say, kegal exercise device so that it could be listed alongside competitor's products. If this is actually the only product at the moment though, there seems to be no point for that. I managed to confirm we have wiki articles on all the external links sources except for Socyberty which may be what you're referring to. Have not checked the references cited within the articles yet, if one of you could follow the example I've put with those that'd be cool. Tyciol (talk) 23:56, 17 April 2009 (UTC)