Talk:Keichousaurus

In the amazon in my home the brazillian rainforest m great grandfather found i small reptile lokking creature near by a cave in the far east of the amazon. about 4 months later we found some bones of a head and a long neck inside the walls of the cave. we never seen nothing like it.
 * interesting, but this talk page is for discussion on the article: how it should be changed, problems, things like that. Keichousaurus is known only from Asia, so what ever you found is something else. peace! Ryan shell (talk) 21:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Recent changes
Is this perhaps being used for a school project right now? I'd feel kind of stupid cleaning up someone's class project.

I hid the added cladogram because it is a direct copy/paste of this link. I didn't remove it because it could be useable if reworked. J. Spencer (talk) 01:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

No real links here; perhaps link to http://www.paleoart.co.uk/images/pic004.jpg ? Practically only decent reconstruction on the net for K. hui. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Necrographical (talk • contribs) 00:40, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keichousaurus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080429200032/http://www.peripatus.gen.nz/Taxa/Chordata/Keichousaurus.html to http://www.peripatus.gen.nz/Taxa/Chordata/Keichousaurus.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:11, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Full picture
https://www.picclickimg.com/d/l400/pict/142858163166_/Keichousaurus-hui-Schwimmsaurier-Skelett-Saurierskelett-Highlight-vollst%C3%A4ndig.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.159.6.199 (talk) 17:17, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

About the authenticity of the 2.7-meter Keichousaurus
Is the 2.7 meter fossil of the creature presented in the source really a Keichousaurus? I searched for an academic treatise about the fossil, but couldn't find it, and I'm not sure if this fossil really belongs to Keichousaurus. Even in the image search, there were only articles about the existence of dragons, and nothing was found about the name of the specific museum where the fossil is exhibited or detailed fossil information. This is lacking credibility as a source. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 15:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)