Talk:Keith Building

stub status
i hate to be unnecessarily pedantic about this, but just because an article is very short does not make it a stub, particularly when accompanied by a completed infobox, referencing, subsections, images, and categories. please see wp:stub for a full description of what makes an article a stub vs. start. ...by any measure, this article is a 'start'. --emerson7 16:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree that this is a stupid thing to edit war over. WP:STUB says that "stub status usually depends on the length of prose text alone – lists, templates, images, and other such peripheral parts of an article are usually not considered when judging whether an article is a stub." (emphasis added) The article is all of four sentences long (and it could be shorter, since the National Register mention has been uncited since 2007 and could be removed). I don't see how it could be considered anything other than a stub. - Eureka Lott 16:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)