Talk:Kellogg Bridge Co. v. Hamilton

This article doesn't make sense to me. "A part of the falsework put up by the company sank under the weight of the first span and was replaced by Hamilton". If Hamilton replaced it then he must have had an opportunity to inspect it, so how can it be claimed that he had no opportunity to inspect it? Biscuittin (talk) 16:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC)