Talk:Kelly Prehn

.

Addressing Proposed Deletion
I don't understand why magazines can't be considered reliable sources. Just because Hello, ¡Hola!, and Elle provide entertainment news doesn't mean they are merely "gossip" or don't fact check. None of the articles used as sources were sensationalistic stories; they generally talk about her influence on the fashion world, which is why I used them to inform the material in this article. Rtt11  talk  15:00, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Addressing Proposed Deletion
You are for sure writing this crap yourself. I propose this page be deleted in its entirety. Regardless of whether or not this is secretly written by Kelly herself, AKA 'One of the most influential people in the fashion industry in China', AKA 'Queen of the Toads'. The blatant assault on our intelligence in this article is embarrassing to this great website, and diminishes its credibility.

If we look a little further into the sources that tout Mrs. England as 'The most influentual people in the fashion industry in China'; chinainfluence.org, simply states she is "Reported in the media as the 'Most Influential Woman in Fashion in China'- Not a primary source. Although, Mrs. England has provided one primary source; a Russian article from Elle magazine. Surely the most 'Influential woman in the fashion industry in China' would warrant an article in English.. Maybe Mandarin? If this qualifies as a reputable source, I should be allowed to list Kim Jong Il as the most skilled golfer in the world, considering that a North Korean article says "The first time Kim Jong Il tried golf he scored 11 hole-in-ones".

The next issue to address is that Mrs. England is clearly using this Wikipedia page to substantiate her absurd claims. This trend is clearly visible in every claim and every source listed here. For example, source [4] where she cites herself as being the author of a popular magazine, is a dead link that simply directs to her company's home page. Also no one has ever heard of it. Not even her friends at Elle Russia.

There is some useful information in this article, however. We got to learn that she married her husband in 2009. For this pivotal detail in her riveting secret-autobiography, she for once has a reputable source to cite; the SCMP. In what might be a front-runner for most mundane article ever, we learn that there was an earthquake on the blushing brides wedding day. Perhaps if it was Kate Middletons wedding day, it could be considered news to some small facet of the internet. Unfortunately though, this article reeks of her toady smell.

As with everything in this preposterous Wiki article, a little further digging shows us everything we need to know. Shockingly Mrs. England was working at the SCMP when this article was written! Now of course Mrs. England wasn't brazen enough to write about herself in a forum where she has to sign her name at the bottom, but her co-worker sure had great things to say about her! Of course choosing to omit the fact that the 'former model turned glamour guru', with suspect ties to Russia, was in fact his co-worker. Maybe conclusions are being jumped to... but after discovering what we have about the shameless corruption in this article; It is far more likely 'Andrew Sun' is simply an alias of Mrs. England, while she masquerades around the 'interweb'- also known as her personal compliment machine.

To sum up; this article has clearly been written by 'Lady Toad' herself. It contains hollow references, absurd claims, and is a clear waste of space- and personally, I find it offensive. Since the poster prior to me is clearly not 'Lady Toad', as she is sure to refer to Mrs. England in the third person; this 'Lady Toad' superfan should reveal themselves. If however, it turns out this was all a rouse, carefully orchestrated by 'The smartest woman in the world, who is also a model, and loves animals'- RussiaAmazingNews.com, I petition that this page should either be removed entirely. Or replaced with the true story of where the nickname 'Lady Toad' came from, a little caveat which was conveniently left out of her thrilling story.

Also if the fact that some froot loop won a pair of earrings at a charity raffle should be considered newsworthy, so much so as to be permanently written on a wikipedia page, this whole website should replaced with the true story of 'Lady Toad.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.85.200.234 (talk) 09:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)