Talk:Kemira

Paid contributions tag
A paid editor made contributions to this article, and has disclosed that fact on this page, therefore the is a matter of fact and does not require discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * According to the policy "if you place the Paid tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article." As a paid editor I'm not allowed to remove the tag myself, but if any volunteer editor thinks that the neutral point of view of the article is ok, they are free to remove the tag as told in the Template:Paid contributions instructions: "If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning."Jjanhone (talk) 17:05, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I've just reverted a COI tag blanking. This article has significant due weight and tone issues; Kemira aims to improve its customers’ water, energy and raw material efficiency. is not encyclopaedic language, and neither is Kemira's strengths are its wide range of water chemicals and its commitment to solving the customer's problems as a whole. – we don't care what companies say about themselves in marketing materials, we care about what reliable sources have to say about them. It's also filled with press-releaseish history that strikes me as excessive. Blablubbs&#124;talk 14:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The lines mentioned here have now been removed. Anything else? I read "press-releish" history as poor references. What are those exactly? Jjanhone (talk) 11:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello Sadads & KarimKoueider! You've edited this article earlier, do you see some problems in its content? Jjanhone (talk) 13:26, 8 July 2021 (UTC)