Talk:Ken Kempster

Case for the article's notability
The tag line on the notability (music) section states: Members of two notable bands are generally notable enough for their own article. Since Kempster has been a member of three independently noteworthy groups, it seems to me that his own article would be probably be warranted. Granted, it's stub-class at the moment and needs some work. Anyway, I'm going to go ahead and delete the 'notability' warning on the article, and maybe we can move discussion regarding his article's worthiness for inclusion in Wikipedia here. Sound good? Colinclarksmith (talk) 17:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The problem is you have not shown that he was a member of any band. One reference you gave say they know little about him and the other is not an independant article (but does mention his day job). The notability tag should stay until you prove he is notable. --Triwbe (talk) 18:51, 8 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure exactly what you were reading from the references I'd previously posted as there was only one, which contained no mention of a day job. Regardless, I've linked his involvement in the aforementioned three noteworthy bands to outside sources, hopefully proving his notability to your satisfaction.  If not, let's continue the discussion.  Colinclarksmith (talk) 21:20, 8 November 2009 (UTC)