Talk:Ken Pavia

Untitled
Little bit concerned about how pro-Ken this is in [places, and how anti- it is in others. Does anyone have any opinions? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 10:49, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

The Ken Pavia page is far from neutral. It lists exaggerated statements that only have his website for citation, which does not meet Wikipedia's criteria. It reads more like a press release. As far as a negative bias, it currently includes a mention of the UFC lawsuit which is verified by numerous secondary sources. Yet even the mention of the UFC lawsuit has been changed to be pro-Pavia, quoting Bjorn Rebney (Rebney is Pavia's co-defendent) regarding the statement. I believe that Pavia, a lawyer, is frequently modifying his page to fend off what he construes to be negative publicity while he continues to promote himself —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.161.181.28 (talk) 22:29, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

The sources cited for the content in the article satisfy Wikipedia's criteria as they are reputable websites. The vast majority of the biographical data is sourced from reputable websites, and not personal sites or blogs as prohibited by Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.189.20.91 (talk) 23:53, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

In response to the issue of sources: if you take another look, you'll find that a vast majority link to Pavia's own website and his own blog on Versus "Point of the Pav" Whether or not this meets Wikipedia criteria, I am not sure, but the vast majority of the biographical data is sourced from highly biased material. It is far from neutral. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NerdyAthlete (talk • contribs) 23:58, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

It appears that this page is continually edited to remove relevant and well documented facts that do not serve the interest of the subject. It is concerning that this page appears to be manipulated to serve as an endorsement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Captchamirror (talk • contribs) 08:43, 21 January 2012 (UTC)