Talk:Kenji Ito/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Kung Fu Man (talk) 05:28, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)

No complaints about this article. There are a few spots where the prose might need tightening but it still sounds fine, and is a very solid, informative read. All in all I enjoyed the article, and wish more people took a look at this stuff (especially since FFL2's "Save the World" is a much beloved piece, if overshadowed by other works).--Kung Fu Man (talk) 05:28, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: