Talk:Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39

New SpaceX Crew Walkway
Can anyone update the article with information and/or a picture of the new SpaceX Crew Walkway on Pad 39A? UnknownM1 (talk) 00:13, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Splitting out LC-39A and LC-39B to separate articles
I think both of these pads are notable enough to have their own articles. The content on this page could be replaced with a more condensed summary and a link to the newly-created main article. This would help avoid the issue of one section dominating over the others, as the section on LC-39A does now. – Jadebenn (talk &middot;&#32;contribs &middot;&#32;subpages) 22:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I have added split templates to the page and am now only seeking to split out LC-39A. – Jadebenn (talk &middot;&#32;contribs &middot;&#32;subpages) 18:52, 21 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Support splitting per nom. --Soumyabrata stay at home wash your hands to protect from coronavirus 13:18, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

"Complex 39" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Complex 39. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 10 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:28, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

NAB?
The small image showing the original layout of the pads has a caption near the VAB for "NAB", which appears to be two smaller buildings by Futch Cove. Anyone have any idea what these are/were? Maury Markowitz (talk) 16:52, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * "Nuclear Assembly Building", where nuclear reactor power systems were planned to be installed. It was never built. . TJRC (talk) 21:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Nice, thanks! I assume this was for the NERVA-related stages? Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm guessing so, based on the third reference, but I don't know much about that program. TJRC (talk) 21:38, 14 July 2022 (UTC)