Talk:Kenneth Chenault/Archives/2012

Cancellation of Merchant Agreement with Author
This section belongs under American Express article, not here. The news article doesn't even state that the letter was addressed to Chenault. Even if the letter was addressed to him, the letter was sent to AmEx and not personally to him, and the actions taken were those of the corporation, not Chenault personally. This section has only peripheral significance to Chenault and is controversial enough that it doesn't belong here per WP:BLP. --EPadmirateur (talk) 16:41, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree that it doesn't belong here. I don't think it belongs in the AmEx article either. They probably cancel merchants every day. This has only been reported in one local paper, so it does not appear to be an especially notable event in that company's long and storied history. The same editor who added it here added almost identical text to a dozen articles.   Will Beback    talk    18:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * unless there is some evidence of his personal involvement, the subject does not belong here. It's as if we put everything published & noteworthy involving Wikipedia in the article for Jimbo.    DGG ( talk ) 00:17, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Monies earned
What's the point of detailing every cent he's received as CEO? Seems entirely unnecessary. Unless of course its a standard applied to all Fortune 500 CEOs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.111.179.37 (talk) 12:45, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Vague, Doesn't give any details
I think this article should have a bit more than what it has.

It gives hardly any insight on what kind of character Kenneth Chenault really is.Nbstandiford (talk) 22:14, 8 August 2010 (UTC)