Talk:Kenneth Nichols/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk) 03:27, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Progression

 * Version of the article when originally reviewed:
 * Version of the article when review was closed:

Technical review

 * Citations: no errors found
 * Disambiguations: Couple found (Atomic Energy Commission, Department of Defense, and one redirect which points back) -
 * Linkrot: Ext links all work -
 * Alt text: Images all have alt text (although this is not a requirement for GA anyway) -

Criteria

 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Overall no major issues and I believe I have corrected any typos.
 * The last para in the 'Post War' section is a little repetative though, as you use 'Nichols' to start the first three sentences... maybe reword a little? Anotherclown (talk) 04:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):


 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):


 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):


 * It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:


 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain':


 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * An excellent article IMO. Just the dab links and a few very minor prose tweaks required. Anotherclown (talk) 04:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅. Fixed the dablinks. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Too easy, looks good to me. Happy to pass. Well done. Anotherclown (talk) 20:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)