Talk:Kenny Roberts/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 01:30, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

I will begin this review shortly. MathewTownsend (talk) 01:30, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
 * B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * *"and as a racing team owner and constructor" in lede - what does this mean "constructor"? constructor of teams?
 * *The result of his earlier application of the throttle was that, he was able to attain top speed faster than his competitors. - Suggestion: Because of his early application of the throttle, he was able to attain top speed faster than his competitors?
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Provides references to all sources:
 * B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Main aspects are addressed:
 * B. Remains focused:
 * 1) Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * *one fair-use
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Very nice article. I have only a few nit-picks. I made the following edits which I think were needed.
 * I will put this on hold for seven days. MathewTownsend (talk) 01:36, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * *one fair-use
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Very nice article. I have only a few nit-picks. I made the following edits which I think were needed.
 * I will put this on hold for seven days. MathewTownsend (talk) 01:36, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Very nice article. I have only a few nit-picks. I made the following edits which I think were needed.
 * I will put this on hold for seven days. MathewTownsend (talk) 01:36, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I will put this on hold for seven days. MathewTownsend (talk) 01:36, 24 December 2011 (UTC)


 * All nit-picks fixed. Article passes GA. Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 20:33, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Comments
Thanks for your help. I've made the edits you suggested (clarified the definition of constructor). Since this is my first GA nomination, I'm not sure what edits I am supposed to make on this page.Orsoni (talk) 04:46, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Nothing further is required from you. It's listing as a GA will happen now. MathewTownsend (talk) 04:07, 28 December 2011 (UTC)