Talk:Kent station (Sound Transit)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Argento Surfer (talk · contribs) 17:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria All of my discussions are open to discussion. Once complete, I will claim this review for points in the 2018 wikicup. Argento Surfer (talk) 17:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * These are my edits for minor issues.
 * "A larger depot was built in 1893 out of bricks" - linking to Brickwork seems unnecessary. And is this different from what the first depot was made from?
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * no concern
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * no concern
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * no concern
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * no concern
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * no concern - AGF for the non-web sources
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * nothing obvious has been omitted
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * no concern
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * no concern
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * no concern
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * no concern
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Is the historic NPR depot the 1889 station or the 1893 station?
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Two minor things that I'm not comfortable addressing myself. Otherwise, this one's good to pass. Argento Surfer (talk) 18:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. The 1893 depot is the one that survives, and I've tried to make it clearer in the prose. Also un-linked the bricks, but I think it's important to note since the first depot was just a wood building, like most of the other early stations for these towns.  Sounder Bruce  22:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the quick response. The changes all look good and this one's ready to promote. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)