Talk:Kentucky Mountain Saddle Horse/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 09:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi, I'll take on this review, though I'm not too familiar with man-made breeds of animals, that might in fact be a good thing (so you can get objective views). FunkMonk (talk) 09:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Perhaps it would be good to separate the registration info from the characteristics info, as in Azteca horse?
 * Maybe add one more image, to show the range in colouration? The head profile is also shown better there.
 * Some of the terminology is a bit hard to follow for the uninitiated, but I guess that's what wikilinks are for. But maybe it could be mentioned that "geldings" are castrated, since the term is used quite a few times?
 * I'm not sure if the word "excellent" is appropriate, isn't it a bit subjective? "and make excellent trail mounts in rugged terrain." Maybe say they are regarded as such, instead of saying they are?
 * That's it from me, sources for both text and images look good. FunkMonk (talk) 09:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, FunkMonk! I definitely appreciate reviews from non-horse people, as they help catch things (like jargon) that fly right past me. I think I've addressed all of your comments above. I don't really like any of the pictures in the article, but there isn't anything better on Commons or free online :( Oh well, hopefully one of these days someone will upload something better... Thanks again, and please let me know if there's anything else that needs work. Dana boomer (talk) 15:09, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Cool, I have no more issues, passed! FunkMonk (talk) 15:11, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: