Talk:Kentucky Railway Museum/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * A few comments:
 * Remember to state the country (you Americans are always forgetting this). (fixed)
 * When quoting material (such as titles) in all-caps, convert to normal capitalization. (fixed)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The image gallery should be removed, per WP:IG. Instead, move the images to the Commons, and add commonscat. Wikipedia articles are not an image depository.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am placing the article on hold until the gallery is removed. How this is done is at the discretion of the authors. Otherwise the article meets the GA criteria. Arsenikk (talk)  12:28, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Gallery is removed; am looking forward to GA passage.-- King Bedford I Seek his grace  07:51, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Congratulations with a good article! Arsenikk (talk)  10:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am placing the article on hold until the gallery is removed. How this is done is at the discretion of the authors. Otherwise the article meets the GA criteria. Arsenikk (talk)  12:28, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Gallery is removed; am looking forward to GA passage.-- King Bedford I Seek his grace  07:51, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Congratulations with a good article! Arsenikk (talk)  10:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)